Everyone Owns the Casino — But Does Caesars Pass Buffett's Test? A 3/9 Breakdown

What Is Caesars Entertainment?

Caesars Entertainment is the largest casino-entertainment company in the United States and one of the most diversified gaming operators in the world. Headquartered in Reno, Nevada, and founded in 1937, the company operates 52 properties across 16 states under iconic brands including Caesars Palace, Harrah's, Horseshoe, and Eldorado. Its portfolio spans approximately 55,700 gaming machines, 2,900 table games, and 47,700 hotel rooms.

The company generates roughly $11.2 billion in annual revenue across three segments. The brick-and-mortar casino business — split between Las Vegas and regional properties — accounts for the vast majority. Casino revenue alone was $6.27 billion in 2024, supplemented by $2.02 billion in hotel revenue and significant food, beverage, and entertainment income. The fastest-growing segment is Caesars Digital, which includes iGaming and online sports betting through the Caesars Sportsbook app. Digital revenue grew 19.5% in 2024, and management has set a $500 million digital EBITDA target.

Caesars' current form is the product of the 2020 merger between Eldorado Resorts and the legacy Caesars Entertainment, a deal that created a gaming behemoth but also loaded the balance sheet with significant debt. That debt overhang — and the company's ongoing struggle to reach consistent profitability — defines much of the investment debate today.

How Caesars Entertainment Scores on All 9 Buffettology Criteria

Caesars Entertainment earns a 3 out of 9 on the Buffettology scoring system. The company passes on business quality and capital return metrics but fails on profitability, leverage, and valuation. Here's the full breakdown.

1. High Return on Equity — FAIL (-4.3%)

The threshold is 12%. Caesars' return on equity is deeply negative at -4.3%, reflecting the company's net losses over the trailing twelve months. When a business loses money, it destroys shareholder equity rather than building it. The negative ROE is a direct consequence of Caesars' heavy interest expense — the company carries over $12 billion in long-term debt, and the cost of servicing that debt wipes out operating profits. Analysts forecast ROE improving to around 5.8% in the coming years, but that's still well below the Buffettology bar.

2. High Return on Invested Capital — FAIL (7.1%)

ROIC measures how efficiently a company uses all capital — debt and equity — to generate returns. The threshold is 9%. Caesars' 7.1% ROIC falls short. For a company with nearly $29 billion in enterprise value, every percentage point of ROIC matters enormously. The gap between Caesars' cost of capital and its return on capital is slim at best, suggesting the business is barely earning its keep on the massive investment required to operate it.

3. Cash Machine — FAIL (~1.3% FCF/Assets)

This criterion checks whether the company generates meaningful free cash flow relative to its asset base. The threshold is 5%. Caesars generates $380 million in free cash flow on an estimated $28+ billion in total assets, yielding roughly 1.3%. While $380 million sounds substantial in isolation, it's modest relative to the enormous asset base required to run 52 casino properties. Operating cash flow of $1.31 billion is healthier, but heavy capital expenditures eat into free cash flow.

4. Fair Valuation — FAIL (-6.5% Earnings Yield)

The earnings yield (inverse of P/E) must exceed 3.5%. Caesars' earnings yield is -6.5% because the company is posting net losses — there's no meaningful P/E ratio to calculate. When earnings are negative, the stock cannot pass this valuation screen regardless of how cheap it looks on other metrics. The company trades at just 0.33x sales and 0.98x book value, but those metrics don't satisfy Buffett's earnings-based valuation test.

5. Share Buybacks — PASS (-5.1% Share Dilution)

Buffett favors companies that shrink their share count. Caesars has been actively repurchasing stock, reducing outstanding shares from approximately 215 million in 2024 to 204 million currently — a decline of about 5.1%. The company authorized a $750 million buyback program and has repurchased 9.35 million shares for $249.85 million since October 2024. This is an aggressive pace for a company with Caesars' leverage, but it signals management's belief that shares are undervalued.

6. Defensible Moat — PASS (50.3% Gross Margin)

Gross margins above 40% indicate pricing power and a competitive moat. Caesars' 50.3% gross margin exceeds the threshold. Casino operators benefit from a powerful structural moat: gaming licenses are strictly limited by state and local regulation, properties require billions in upfront capital, brand recognition drives customer loyalty, and the Caesars Rewards program — one of the largest loyalty programs in gaming — creates meaningful switching costs. Competitors can't simply open a casino across the street.

7. Simple Business — PASS (Consumer Cyclical)

Caesars runs casinos, hotels, restaurants, and entertainment venues. Customers gamble, stay in hotel rooms, eat at restaurants, and attend shows. The digital segment adds online sports betting and iGaming. While the company is large and complex operationally, the core business model is straightforward and easy to understand — a key Buffettology requirement.

8. Conservative Debt — FAIL (6.47x Debt/Equity)

The threshold is 1.5x. Caesars' debt-to-equity ratio of 6.47x is more than four times the maximum. Total debt stands at roughly $12.1 billion against $4.1 billion in shareholder equity. The Altman Z-Score of 0.56 signals elevated bankruptcy risk. This is the legacy of the Eldorado-Caesars merger, which was largely debt-financed. Management is focused on deleveraging, but the debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 6.97x shows how many years of cash flow it would take to pay down the balance — even before interest.

9. Consistent Growth — FAIL (Negative Net Income)

Five-year net income growth must be positive. Caesars has posted net losses in recent periods, with a trailing net margin of -2.12%. The company's path from the 2020 merger through pandemic recovery has been volatile, and while revenue has stabilized near $11.2 billion, profitability at the bottom line remains elusive. Adjusted EBITDA of $3.46 billion shows the underlying business generates cash, but GAAP net income — which accounts for the enormous interest expense — has been consistently negative.

The Bull Case

Digital is a high-margin growth engine. Caesars Digital posted record EBITDA performance in 2025, and the $500 million digital EBITDA target for 2026 represents a massive step-up from $117 million in 2024. Online sports betting and iGaming carry higher margins than brick-and-mortar operations, and as more states legalize, Caesars' established brand and technology platform give it a competitive edge. A potential IPO of the digital unit could unlock billions in value.

Las Vegas is recovering. The Las Vegas Strip's gross gaming revenue rose 8% year-over-year in October 2025, and Caesars' flagship properties — including Caesars Palace — are positioned to capture that upside. New entertainment programming, including residencies and events, drives hotel bookings and gaming traffic. About a third of Caesars' revenue comes from Las Vegas, making the Strip's health directly material to the stock.

The buyback signals deep undervalue. Management is repurchasing shares aggressively despite carrying significant debt — a move that only makes sense if leadership believes the stock is deeply undervalued. At $23 per share with a $42 median analyst price target, the implied upside is over 75%. The company's price-to-book ratio of 0.98x means the market is valuing Caesars at less than the accounting value of its assets minus liabilities.

Free cash flow is inflecting. With lower capital expenditures expected and declining cash interest expense as debt is refinanced, 2025 and 2026 are expected to deliver significantly stronger free cash flow. Management has guided toward using excess cash to reduce leverage, which would directly benefit equity holders by reducing interest expense and improving net income.

The Bear Case

The debt load is staggering. At $12.1 billion in total debt and a debt-to-equity ratio of 6.47x, Caesars is one of the most leveraged large-cap companies in the consumer sector. Interest expense alone consumes a massive portion of operating income, turning what would be a profitable business on an EBITDA basis into a GAAP money-loser. In a rising rate environment, refinancing risk adds another layer of concern.

Las Vegas tourism has softened. Despite the October gaming revenue spike, broader Las Vegas visitor data has been weaker — visitor volume down 7.6%, convention attendance down 0.6%, and RevPAR down 8.7%. If these trends persist, Caesars' highest-margin segment could face headwinds. The company's heavy concentration in Las Vegas (roughly a third of revenue) makes it particularly vulnerable.

Consumer spending risk is real. Casino gaming is pure discretionary spending. Caesars' customer base spans income levels, and inflationary pressures, economic uncertainty, and shifting consumer priorities could reduce gaming volumes. Regional casino performance has already shown signs of softening, with margins under pressure from competitive dynamics and weaker hold percentages.

Profitability remains elusive. Despite $11.2 billion in revenue and $3.46 billion in adjusted EBITDA, Caesars has a -2.12% net margin. The gap between adjusted metrics and GAAP reality is enormous, driven almost entirely by interest expense. Until the company can sustainably generate positive net income, the stock will struggle to attract quality-focused investors.

The beta is punishing. With a beta of 1.99, Caesars stock moves nearly twice as much as the broader market in either direction. This makes it a volatile holding that amplifies portfolio risk — the opposite of the stable, predictable businesses Buffett typically favors.

Valuation Overview

Traditional P/E analysis is impossible for Caesars because earnings are negative. The trailing P/E is not calculable, and forward P/E estimates remain unreliable given the company's inconsistent profitability path.

On alternative metrics, Caesars looks cheap. The stock trades at just 0.33x trailing sales, well below Simply Wall St's estimated fair price-to-sales of 1.5x. The price-to-book ratio of 0.98x means the market values Caesars at less than its net asset value. EV/EBITDA stands at 8.25x, below the company's own five-year average of 10.34x and the estimated 2026 ratio of 5.9x.

Analyst consensus is notably bullish. Out of 22 Wall Street analysts covering CZR, 14 rate it a Buy, 3 a Hold, and none a Sell. The median price target is $41, with a range of $27 to $64. The average target of $42.23 implies roughly 75% upside from the current share price near $23. Simply Wall St's fair value estimate also suggests the stock is trading below fair value by more than 20%.

The disconnect between analyst optimism and the stock's depressed price reflects the market's skepticism about Caesars' ability to convert its strong EBITDA generation into actual bottom-line profitability — and that skepticism is warranted given the debt burden.

The Buffettology Verdict

Caesars Entertainment's 3/9 Buffettology score tells a clear story: this is a business with genuine competitive advantages — a powerful brand, regulatory moats, and a 50% gross margin — buried under a mountain of debt that makes it fundamentally incompatible with Buffett's framework.

The three criteria Caesars passes — share buybacks, defensible moat, and business simplicity — reflect real strengths. The six failures all trace back, directly or indirectly, to the leverage from the 2020 merger. The debt suppresses ROE, consumes free cash flow, prevents a positive earnings yield, and creates the volatility and risk that Buffett explicitly avoids.

For deep-value or special-situation investors willing to bet on deleveraging, Caesars may offer compelling upside — the analyst consensus implies 75% appreciation from here. But for investors applying Buffett's quality-and-value framework, the message is straightforward: great business, wrong capital structure.

Check CZR on Buffett Score

Want to find stocks that score higher on Buffett's framework? Download the Vetted app to explore detailed Buffettology analysis across thousands of stocks, plus scores from multiple expert investment strategies.